Dean has a way of reaching to into the gut with his style. He has charisma that Kerry only dreamed about. He has a cohesive plan that makes sense, that will present an understandable alternative to the extremist policies of the Republicans. Even if the electorate doesn't agree with all the details, Dean's ideas will likely pass the "gut test" better than Bush's policies which is beginning to fail the "stink test" even for Republicans.
CNN.com - Sources: Reid, Pelosi backing Roemer for DNC chair - Dec 14, 2004
Amid strong competition over who will lead the party as the next Democratic National Committee chairman, former Indiana congressman and 9/11 commission member Tim Roemer has emerged as a possible new candidate. He has the strong backing of Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, senior party sources told CNN Tuesday.
Sounds innocuous doesn't it? But wait, TR is no average Democrat. He could be standing up there with Bush on topics like abortion and Social Security like Lieberman has on Iraq and Homeland Security. Take a look at this guys voting record. Talk about Republican-lite!
Here is Tim Roemer on some more issues:
Voted YES on banning human cloning, including medical research. (Jul 2001) Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001) Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001) Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000) Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999) Voted YES on Constitutional amendment prohibiting Flag Desecration. (Jul 2001) Voted NO on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun 2000) Voted YES on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999) Voted NO on maintaining right of habeus corpus in Death Penalty Appeals. (Mar 1996) Voted YES on making federal death penalty appeals harder. (Feb 1995) Voted NO on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001) Voted NO on banning soft money donations to national political parties. (Jul 2001) Voted NO on allowing suing HMOs, but under federal rules & limited award. (Aug 2001) Voted NO on Prescription Drug Coverage under Medicare. (Jun 2000) Voted YES on banning physician-assisted suicide. (Oct 1999) Voted YES on deploying SDI (Star Wars Missile Defense). (Mar 1999) Member of Democratic Leadership Council. (Nov 2000)
Complete Article
Sources: Reid, Pelosi backing Roemer for DNC chair
From Steve Turnham
CNN Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Amid strong competition over who will lead the party as the next Democratic National Committee chairman, former Indiana congressman and 9/11 commission member Tim Roemer has emerged as a possible new candidate.
He has the strong backing of Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, senior party sources told CNN Tuesday.
Roemer, in a written statement, confirmed that he had been approached about the post. While he was noncommittal, he indicated he is open to the idea.
"I have been approached very recently by several prominent Democrats inquiring about my interest in seeking the post of DNC chair," he said. "While I am flattered by their confidence in me, I have made no formal decision to seek the post. I am, however, consulting with my family, friends and Democrats around the country to assess this potential opportunity, and expect to make a decision very soon. The new DNC chair will have an important role to play in helping shape the future organization, message and direction of the party, and it's an exciting opportunity for whoever takes on the task."
With the support of Reid and Pelosi, Roemer immediately has an advantage over the declared candidates, former presidential candidate Howard Dean and former Clinton aide Harold Ickes.
Reid is strongly encouraging a Roemer bid, according to the sources.
Roemer's experience on the 9/11 commission, together with the fact that he comes from a "red state" -- one that voted for President Bush -- were decisive factors in Reid's decision to back him, the sources said.
Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/14/dnc.chair
1 comment:
Here's your stink test: Anyone currently in power in the upper reaches of the Democratic Party: PEE-YOU!!!
Anyone right of center, from a Red State, or Massachusetts, PU.
Anyone without real charisma, a common touch, and an unblemished record of fighting hard for us working stiffs, YOU STINK!
Anyone rich, who never held a real job, or started a small business, or worked a real farm or a fishing boat, B.O.! Cram yer resumes, Ivy Leaguers.
If we wanted Republicans, we'd vote REPUBLICAN! Get it? They're so freakin' worried about maybe five per cent of Repukes who "might" switch, they forget all about the 40-60% who don't vote at all, cuz they don't have a candidate. We actually got a lot of them out there this time, but then Kerry let the Pukes steal the election, AGAIN!!!
The non-voters want a FIGHTER who NEVER gives up. They need a man or woman who can motivate them by showing he GETS their issues: Jobs, cost of living, education, health care, the war, the police state, etc. Not a freakin' waffler or a flip-flopper. A FIGHTER.
Once again, the Dems are in a struggle against the forces of Republicanization: The last time, Bill Clinton's Republicrats won, and then lost Congress. They did NOTHING for the average guy for EIGHT YEARS. We need a left-of-centrist with the balls to defend our proud, endangered, and vital liberal & progressive history & values. Otherwise, we get a Republican, either way.
That's what the non-voters are sick of: Republican dog-breath. Get that 40-60%, plus the base, and you win. Otherwise, you stink of failure. Again.
Post a Comment