In particular, educators are failing to give high school students an appreciation of the First Amendment’s guarantees of free speech and a free press, say researchers from the University of Connecticut, who questioned more than 100,000 high school students, nearly 8,000 teachers, and more than 500 administrators and principals.
[...]
The survey suggests that First Amendment rights – freedom of speech, of the press, of religion, of assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances – would be universally known if they were classroom staples.
“High school attitudes about the First Amendment are important because each generation of citizens helps define what freedom means in our society,†the report reads.
Among its findings:
* Nearly three-fourths of high school students either do not know how they feel about the First Amendment or admit they take it for granted.
* Seventy-five percent erroneously think flag burning is illegal.
* Half believe the government can censor the Internet.
* More than a third think the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.
“These results are not only disturbing; they are dangerous,†said Knight Foundation President and CEO Hodding Carter III. “Ignorance about the basics of this free society is a danger to our nation’s future.â€
If you've ever seen Jay Leno interview people off the streets in New York City, you have been surprised as I at how ignorant the man and woman on the street is. Basic information about who is vice president, how our government works, basic history and geography is beyond many of those interviewed. As much as I've laughed at the time, its an article like this that makes me shudder at the implications.
The reason Bush is getting away with all that he is is because the average voter in America has no where near the information they need to participate in government. And if we find the electorate easy to manipulate by misinformation, we shouldn't be surprised.
Our way of life is in grave danger.
Complete Article
Survey Finds First Amendment
Is Being Left Behind in U.S. High Schools
Jan. 31, 2005
RELATED LINKS
www.firstamendmentfuture.org
Field Report
A Call to Action
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new national study, the largest of its kind, says America’s high schools are leaving the First Amendment behind.
In particular, educators are failing to give high school students an appreciation of the First Amendment’s guarantees of free speech and a free press, say researchers from the University of Connecticut, who questioned more than 100,000 high school students, nearly 8,000 teachers, and more than 500 administrators and principals.
The two-year, $1 million research project, titled “The Future of the First Amendment,†was commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
The survey suggests that First Amendment rights – freedom of speech, of the press, of religion, of assembly and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances – would be universally known if they were classroom staples.
“High school attitudes about the First Amendment are important because each generation of citizens helps define what freedom means in our society,†the report reads.
Among its findings:
* Nearly three-fourths of high school students either do not know how they feel about the First Amendment or admit they take it for granted.
* Seventy-five percent erroneously think flag burning is illegal.
* Half believe the government can censor the Internet.
* More than a third think the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.
“These results are not only disturbing; they are dangerous,†said Knight Foundation President and CEO Hodding Carter III. “Ignorance about the basics of this free society is a danger to our nation’s future.â€
In addition, the more students are exposed to the First Amendment and use the news media in the classroom, and the more involved they are in student journalism, the greater their appreciation of First Amendment rights.
Among those students who have taken courses dealing with the media or the First Amendment, for example, 87 percent believe people should be allowed to express unpopular opinions. Among students who have not taken such courses, however, the number fell to 68 percent.
Though student journalists are the savviest among all high school students on the First Amendment, a quarter of U.S. schools do not even offer media programs to students.
“The last 15 years have not been a golden era for student media,†said Warren Watson, director of the J-Ideas project at Ball State University in Muncie, Ind. “Programs are under siege or dying from neglect. Many students do not get the opportunity to practice our basic freedoms.â€
Nearly all principals surveyed agreed students should learn about journalism, but said financial constraints block the expansion of media programs.
The Department of Public Policy at the University of Connecticut was commissioned by Knight Foundation to conduct this study of students, faculty and administrators at 544 high schools across the country. Dr. David Yalof and Dr. Kenneth Dautrich of the University of Connecticut conducted the research.
“Civic education is crucial to developing well-informed and responsible citizens,†said Dautrich, chairman of the university’s Department of Public Policy. “By surveying students across the country as to their awareness and appreciation of First Amendment rights, Knight Foundation has provided a timely window into this important and often overlooked aspect of the educational process.â€
Knight Foundation commissioned a panel of experts to consult and comment on the project. Project advisers included Jack Dvorak of Indiana University; Rosalind Stark of the Student Press Law Center (and formerly of the Radio and Television News Directors Foundation); Diana Mitsu Klos of the American Society of Newspaper Editors; Warren Watson of J-Ideas; Scott Olson, former dean of Ball State University’s College of Communications, Information and Media now at Minnesota State University, Mankato; Gene Policinski, executive director of the Freedom Forum First Amendment Center; and Dr. Kristin Moore, president and senior scholar, Child Trends.
The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation promotes excellence in journalism worldwide and invests in the vitality of 26 U.S. communities.
###
Contact: Larry Meyer, Vice President of Communications and Secretary, (305) 908-2610
1 comment:
Yeah.
This is what happens. These kids are growing up in schools where there are armed guards and metal detectors. They are subject to warrantless locker-searches and random piss-tests. Some schools have video surveillance cameras, everywhere. There is no expectation of privacy.
Courts keep ruling away students' most basic rights and freedoms. Participation in "extra-curricular" activities like sports, band, drama and other clubs is often contingent on giving up even more rights, "voluntarily." And these students all know, from early childhood, that their future in the adult world depends upon their "career" in school. If they don't "perform" and "behave," our ever-more ruthless and rigid class structure will grind them up and spit them out.
Meanwhile, many of these schools are under tremendous budgetary constraints, and more and more demanding mandates from municipal, county, State and Federal governments. Politicians, administrators, school boards, interest groups, teachers unions, taxpayers and parents all place more pressure on the schools, which respond by pre-emptively clamping down on teachers and students.
In this repressive atmosphere, how the Hell could anybody teach anyone anything, much less their theoretical rights? Students today must naturally regard things like the US Constitution as strange, incomprehensible, historical documents of a bygone era. And maybe they are. But don't blame the students, or the teachers.
Did it ever occur to anyone that, while protecting these kids from everything under the sun, we might be teaching them by our actions that civil liberties, human rights, basic freedoms, even human dignity itself were meaningless concepts that simply do not apply, at least not under "special circumstances"? It's like a Third-World dictator's "State of Emergency:" Carte blanche to simply eliminate all rights. This is what we are teaching our children, by restricting their freedoms: Freedom means nothing to us.
Post a Comment