It’s Official: Tunisia Now Freer than the U.S.

I don't know about you, but I really appreciate this old Madisonian, Juan Cole:

Arguably, Tunisians are now freer than Americans. The US government thinks our private emails are actually public. The FBI and NSA routinely read our email and they and other branches of the US government issue security letters in the place of warrants allowing them to tap phones and monitor whom we call, and even to call up our library records and conduct searches of our homes without telling us about it. Millions of telephone records were turned over to George W. Bush by our weaselly telecom companies. Courts allow government agents to sneak onto our property and put GPS tracking devices under our automobiles without so much as a warrant or even probable cause. Mr. Obama thinks this way of proceeding is a dandy idea.
The Fourth Amendment is on the verge of vanishing, and this attack on the Constitution is being abetted by pusillanimous and corrupt judges and fascistic elements in our national security apparatus. Freedom of peaceable assembly is also being whittled away in the United States of America via devices such as ‘free speech zones;’ the founding generation intended that the whole of the United States be a free speech zone. Many of the protests in the Middle East being cheered on by Americans would be illegal in this country.
Few among the public even seem to care about these assaults on our liberties here. At least the youth of the Middle East can generate a little passion over censorship and unreasonable surveillance. Makes an old Madisonian tear up a little.

Related articles

• Late Night: 'And That's How I Know That It's Time to Be Brave' (firedoglake.com)
• Student files lawsuit over FBI's GPS tracking (msnbc.msn.com)
• Cell phone location data subject to Fourth Amendment and is more invasive than GPS [updated with link] (geodatapolicy.wordpress.com)

Wael Ghonim vs. Barack Obama: Change we Can Believe in, Yes we Can

Juan Cole eviscerates Obama comparing him dis-favorably to the hero of the Egyptian revolution. Follow the link and read. Open your eyes to the fact that the US is no longer the beacon of freedom. I'm beginning to think that nothing short of bringing it to the streets in the US will make a difference.

It is no secret that President Barack Obama has been in some regards a profound disappointment to the American Left, and his erratic and often disgraceful performance on the Egypt crisis exemplifies his faults in this regard. (Tom Engelhardt puts it best regarding the administration: “It has shown itself to be weak, visibly fearful, at a loss for what to do, and always several steps behind developing events.”) Obama just seems to lack empathy with the little people and is unwilling to buck the rich and powerful, even though they all opposed his run for the presidency.

More

Related articles

• "Wael Ghonim, liberated Google exec, speaks to throng of thousands in Cairo protest" and related posts (thefutureofnews.com)
• Powerful Interview of Google Executive/Egyptian Activist Wael Ghonim (disquietreservations.blogspot.com)
• Wael Ghonim Rejoins Egypt's 'Internet Revolution' Amid Reports Mubarak Will Leave (wired.com)

Hellegers: American Income Inequality is the Cause of our Crisis

The Tea Party movement is just a clever disguise for an oilman to control America. Inequality has always be a moral issue, now it is clearly an economic issue. The rich have seized control of policy making in the US and they may again seize control of government in the next election. As usual, Juan Cole has it right.

Informed Comment

Plutarch, writing almost 2,000 years ago, told us that “an imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.”
Below is a chart that shows the course of income imbalance over the last 93 years in the U.S. If it showed the course of net worth imbalance, it would be much more dramatic. If it showed data for the top tenth of one percent– not just the top ten percent– it would be extraordinarily dramatic.
Inter alia, the chart shows that both the Great Depression of the ’30s and the present crisis were immediately preceded by great buildups in inequality. When ordinary people lack the wealth to buy things– houses for example–the system crashes.
There’s also a lot of data that show that economic equality conduces, quite literally, to the health of society. The correlation between equality and most measures of well-being is stronger than the correlation between wealth and well-being. See Richard G. Wilkinson & Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level (2009). For a good review of that book, see David Runciman in the London Review of Books, Oct. 22, 2009, .
Still, the rich consistently try to destroy egalitarianism, because for their segment, inequality is fine. It means increasingly desperate people trying increasingly hard to serve the rich. The rich also try to destroy the political means by which the rest of society might seek relief, which is exactly Plutarch’s point. Witness the rise of the present-day Tea Parties. A recent article in the New Yorker describes how the Koch brothers– Texas billionaires– have lavishly financed that movement.
In 1980 Ronald Reagan managed to break the egalitarian consensus that had held since FDR. (See the chart.) The key was playing on racial divisions. Reagan’s first campaign speech was in Philadelphia, Misssissippi. That town is famous for one thing only. It’s where three civil rights workers were lynched and murdered in the 1960s. Reagan’s target audience didn’t miss his message. Social justice was cast in terms of giveaways to demonized blacks– mythologized welfare queens in Cadillacs. Reagan’s ascendancy, by his exploitation of the race issue, is described by Thomas B. & Mary D. Edsall in Chain Reaction (1992). Thomas Edsall, until his retirement, was a reporter for the Washington Post.
The U.S. is now more unequal than a number of countries in Latin America. When I was younger it was accepted wisdom that those countries would never get anywhere until they solved the inequality problem.

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Great Divergence - how did income inequality get so bad? (americablog.com)
• The Great Divergence: Trying to understand income inequality, the most profound change in American society in your lifetime. (slate.com)
• Inequality and the crash: How egalitarian policy fueled the US housing crisis (induslatin.com)
• America Should Rethink Self-Destructive Income Inequality: Financial Times Deutschland, Germany (themoderatevoice.com)
• How egalitarian policy fueled the crisis (economist.com)
• Income Inequality: 'The Most Profound Change In American Society In Your Lifetime' (huffingtonpost.com)

Obama said Wavering on Troop Escalation in Afghanistan

Juan Cole weighs in on the disaster that is Afghanistan. Apparently, Obama is considering a major change in direction, perhaps withdrawing troops instead of adding more. And Biden is leading that charge. Lets hope that Obama figures out that Biden is his foreign policy expert and defers to his judgment. Hillary is just another neo-con.

Image via Wikipedia

The NYT says that President Barack Obama is reconsidering his plan to greatly increase the number of US troops in Afghanistan, and to be suffering "buyer's remorse" for sending 21,000 more troops there soon after his inauguration and before a proper policy review. The article suggests a stark difference of opinion between vice president Joe Biden who has the most foreign policy experience of anyone in the administration and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Biden is said to favor fewer US troops and a focus on al-Qaeda in the Pakistani badlands. Clinton is afraid the Taliban will take back over Afghanistan and invite al-Qaeda back in there.

[..]You can't do development aid very effectively in a country beset by guerrilla violence. Moreover, counter-insurgency requires a legitimate, effective Afghan partner that can compete with the Taliban and their allies for Afghan hearts and minds. And, if counter-terrorism is really the goal, then you don't need a 60,000-man army in a country notoriously inhospitable to foreign armies.

The Obama administration seems to be considering whether these four levels can be usefully unentangled.

In particular, incumbent president Hamid Karzai's clumsy attempt to steal the election and his continued seeming inability really to take charge in the country he de jure rules, appears to have provoked the Obama team to wonder whether they could in fact work with Karzai.

Personally, I think Biden is right and that if the administration will bet on him, they'd put us 2 or 3 years ahead of the curve.

via Informed Comment: Obama said Wavering on Troop Escalation in Afghanistan

Related articles by Zemanta

• Muslim Khan: Taliban Spokeman Arrested By Pakistani Forces in Swat (huffingtonpost.com)


• Obama praises Afghans for voting (news.bbc.co.uk)


• Counter-insurgency Fights: There's More Than One Approach (windsofchange.net)


• Afghan challenger says election 'widely rigged' (nationalpost.com)


• AP sources: Instead of troops, maybe more drones (seattletimes.nwsource.com)


• White House split over more troops for Afghanistan (telegraph.co.uk)


• US's 'arc of instability' just gets bigger (citizengkar.wordpress.com)


• Taliban's bombs came from US, not Iran (citizengkar.wordpress.com)


• Are the Taliban Beating NATO on Logistics? Why Washington Needs Iran and Russia (citizengkar.wordpress.com)