Image via Wikipedia
On Friday, an amendment he authored was added to the House bill that allows states to create their own single-payer systems instead of adopting the federally-run exchange system. The original bill allowed states only to enact their own exchange system -- it was a nod to federalism -- with the proviso that if a state (think a deep red one in the South) refused to adopt the plan, the feds could step in and set it up.Related articles by Zemanta
The Kucinich amendment is really key. If it were to survive the legislative sausage-making and be enacted into law, the we might expect a progressive state to take advantage of the opportunity and enact a single-payer system in the coming years. And, if those of us who have been pushing such an arrangement are correct, the result will be greater access and better outcomes at a lower price tag for that state's residents.
And then we can move from an often ill-informed argument over the Canadian or British systems to a debate in which we can hold up a model in which millions of real Americans see very tangible benefits from an actual single-payer system in action.
- Small Victory for Long-Term Single-Payer Strategy (bradblog.com)
- Senate Panel OKs Plan To Revamp Health Care System (huffingtonpost.com)
- Single-Payer and the 'Democracy Deficit' (bradblog.com)
- Reader Calls Out Milbank For Distorting Health Care Debate (huffingtonpost.com)
- Myths about Canadian health care (masbury.wordpress.com)
- Call a Canadian (scienceblogs.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment