Image by Getty Images via Daylife
One of the side benefits of health reform is that it has acted as a character test. If, for example, you thought of Mitt Romney as a person of character, his desperate attempts to disavow what is essentially his own policy proposal have cured you of that affliction. And as Menzie Chinn points out, Robert Samuelson’s hysterical reaction to what is, when all is said and done, a fairly modest — and paid for! — expansion of social insurance tells what what really lies behind his constant harping on the long-run fiscal issue.
Menzie has a nice chart comparing four policies and their impact on the budget: the two big Bush tax cuts, the Iraq war, and the health reform:
It’s curious, then, that Samuelson and others are driven wild only by the last of these. But Dan Gross explained it all a while back:it’s about a strain of intellectual Toryism bedeviled by the haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be getting social insurance.All that high-minded talk about fiscal responsibility is just a cover for this deeper-seated concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment